Its the same unbalanced garbage that really requires very little skill and lots of bulls***. Its the same garbage circular map design where its basically a matter of who sees who first with a focus on grinding so you can unlock the cheap a** weapons so you can mow down the lower level players who use pea shooters. I do not understand how people still enjoy this after all these years and improvements from other series. This multiplayer is just bad, they took a lot of inspiration from the originals for the campaign but didnt do anything for the multiplayer.

Advanced Warfare had one of the better multiplayer components in recent years and it still wasnt very good. Its still the same garbage tripe that the series has been pushing out the past few years. So the campaign is great, whats wrong? Well the zombies is meh, not bad nor good. The switch back to healthpacks instead of the regenerating bulls*** is a amazing choice here. Its a pretty good campaign but very short (5 or 6 hours on hardened). Those two are classics and this game definitely tries to recapture what made those so good. Call of Duty 1 and 2 have the best campaigns as they were made with primarily a PC focus and the campaigns were the main draw point to those two. I personally think all of the campaigns since the first two have aged like **** but MW1, MW2, Blops, WAW, were all pretty fun campaigns when they came out. This is the best Call of Duty campaign in roughly ten years.

I personally think all of the campaigns since the first two Okay so first off.

Call of duty world at war 2 Divisions